|
Stepping up to the WASL
A local middle school seeks to improve its testing status
By ROSETTE ROYALE
Staff Reporter
 |
Arun Somasundaram is a student at Chinook Middle
School, in the Highline Public Schools District. The soon-to-be
14-year-old credits teachers there with helping him surpass state
goals on all of last year’s WASL exams. Yet while Somasundaram
has found success, many of his classmates still struggle to bring
WASL scores up to state standards. Photo by Joel Turner
|
Bing bing bing bing.
The electronic bell announcing the end of fifth period chimes over
the intercom of Chinook Middle School and, as its tone disintegrates
into the ether, the closed classroom doors burst open, releasing streams
of students into the barren corridors.
Laughter bounces off tiled walls. Backpacks yawn open in receipt
of books. Lockers slam shut in percussive succession. Another quartet
of bells ring out. Racing against its dying strains, a thin, dark-skinned
girl, her pigtails bouncing with kinetic fury, sprints a diagonal
path from locker to classroom. A door latches closed. And once again,
silence and stillness reign.
Kim Ustanick, having wended her way through the youthful tide, enters
a room adorned with colorful posters at the southern end of the hall.
A part-time employee, Ustanick serves as Family/Community Support
Liaison for Chinook, one of several middle schools in the Highline
Public Schools District. Eight years in this capacity has left her
with unrepentant and passionate views about why educational levels
are lower in South King County.
 |
Kim Ustanick, Family/Community Support Liaison
at Chinook, attends a community meeting on the WASL. Photo by
Joel Turner |
“At this school,” she says, “we’re about
70 percent free and reduced lunch,” speaking of a statistic
that can be taken as a barometer for a region’s socio-economic
make-up. (The percentage for Chinook is nearly twice the state average.)
She continues talking, eyes trained on a map.
“Over here,” she says, her finger acting as pointer,
“what we have is I-5. And,” her finger shifts leftward,
“we have [the Seattle-Tacoma International] Airport.”
Her nail taps an area on the map located between the two landmarks.
“This is us.” She means Chinook.
But more than being hemmed in by an interstate to the east and an
airport to west, or even caught under someone’s finger, Chinook
finds itself pinned down by an educational reality and regional perception.
The reality is that the Chinook Middle School, a red brick building
attended by more than 600 seventh- and eighth-graders whose racial
makeup — roughly 26 percent Hispanic, 22 percent Asian/Pacific
Islander, 18 percent Black, 31 percent white —stands in stark
contrast to state averages, is not meeting federal achievement goals.
Those goals are determined by student scores on the Washington Assessment
of Student Learning, or — in the parlance of educators and administrators,
concerned parents and their test-loathing children — the WASL.
Unless something is done, federal mandates warn, to bring those
scores into alignment with state standards, Chinook will be deemed
a school that has failed the requirements of the No Child Left Behind
Act (NCLB). That Chinook Middle School and its attendant community
cannot keep up, that others are leaving them behind— it’s
this perception that administrators, teachers, parents, and students
are working to upend.
Signed into law by President Bush in 2002, the NCLB mandates that
any school receiving federal funds where test scores do not satisfy
achievement goals for two years running will be placed on what’s
called an “improvement” list. Viewed as a ladder, this
improvement list bears five rungs: Step One being the highest, or
closest to removal from the list, and Step Five, the most dire designation,
the lowest.
According to a preliminary report issued last fall by the state’s
Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Washington has
248 schools on its improvement list. Eight of these schools are in
Step Five. Four state schools are in Step Four, a rung above those
viewed most at risk. One of these Step Four schools is Chinook.
|
Schooling the Schools
The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) requires schools to make
what the federal government calls “adequate yearly progress”
on the Washington Assessment for Student Learning. If a portion
of the school’s students don’t meet the expectations
over two consecutive years, the school lands on Level One. After
that, each consecutive year of failure bumps them down a level,
and means the school must not only continue its previous efforts
but try new things, too:
• Step One (two consecutive years of failing to meet
the feds’ expectations): Schools must adopt two-year improvement
plans, pay for professional development for teachers, and allow
parents the option to transfer their children to a higher-performing
public or charter school, with the district paying for the costs
of transportation.
• Step Two (three consecutive years): Give students
from low-income families the option of obtaining services, such
as tutoring, from outside providers.
• Step Three (four consecutive years): Do one or more
of the following: Implement new curriculum, replace school staff,
appoint an outside expert as advisor, or extend the school day
or year.
• Step Four (five consecutive years): Plan for more
restructuring, including possibly replacing all or most of the
staff, reopening as a charter, contracting with a private overseer,
or turning over operations to the state.
• Step Five (six consecutive years): Implement the plan
they made in Step Four.
More than 100 Washington schools have been listed in Step
One, 45 in Step Two, 65 in Step Three, four in Step Four, and
eight in Step Five. Of these last eight, all are located in
Central Washington, where students failing the test are predominantly
low-income male Hispanics and Native Americans.
— Kevin Himeda |
Seated around a grouping of tables in Chinook’s library, parents
and students are gathered for a community meeting on the WASL. Nearly
40 people, mostly adults, occupy chairs constructed for young people,
listening to counselors and teachers instruct them how the audience
will be divided into two groups: one English speaking, the other Spanish
speaking. Like a cell splitting during mitosis, the group cleaves,
the halves heading to different classrooms.
There are four “strands,” or separate tests that make
up the WASL — reading, writing, math, science — and the
evening community meeting, taking such structure as a guide, is broken
into four segments, each taught in separate lessons. Each half of
the larger group will visit the four classrooms in turn.
During the writing segment, a teacher parses, via an overhead projector,
two actual student essays culled from a past WASL, one meeting state
standards, the other falling short. She points to the essays’
command, or lack of, cohesion, and tone. The teacher advises parents
to encourage their students to write at home during their free time.
As she speaks, a mother rushes into the room, her son in tow. “Sorry,”
she says, nearly out of breath. “I just got off of work.”
She takes a seat. The teacher returns to the essays.
Seconds later, a father stands up from a chair. He twists his hat
in his hands. “I have to go,” he tells the teacher. “Work.”
She nods.
 |
Students entering the hallway at Chinook
Middle School, responding to the toll of the bell. Photo by
Joel Turner
|
Why, a parent wonders aloud, is there so much stress around passing
the WASL for graduation, if a child can retake all sections of the
test in their sophomore, junior, and senior years until they pass
each one?
“Because it all matters,” answers Ustanick, standing
near the doorway. “Our schools are being judged each year.”
During the math segment, a teacher suggests parents could try to
incorporate vocabulary from a handout — containing such terms
as rhombus, radii, theoretical probability, and stem-and-leaf plot
— into daily discussions. A father furrows his brow.
“Should my child be stressed out?” a second father asks.
“You can only prepare them as much as you can,” a second
teacher advises.
In another room, a female teacher tells the parents the science
WASL is filled with written language. “So reading skills are
essential.” She admits this presents a challenge to students
who haven’t mastered English.
Highlighting a sheet that shows how the science test is scored,
she tells parents that only 18 percent of Chinook students who took
that WASL met the state standard. She recommends educational TV as
a tool to helpyoung people understand science. “And the kitchen
is one of the best places for kids to learn,” she adds.
The parents trudge off to a new room.
A male teacher, who has just spoken to the Spanish-speaking group
in their native tongue, tells the English speakers that the reading
WASL should not be viewed as mysterious. Parents nod their heads as
they gaze at a screen.
Nearly 75 percent of Chinook students would have passed the reading
WASL, he goes on, if they had only gotten two more questions right.
The adults cheer up at this information. Riding that wave, he says,
Some students may not have done well because they had a bad day.
“What if the person grading the test has a bad day?”
a mother asks. The rest of the parents grunt in agreement.
The teacher concedes it could happen. “But it’s a complicated
system for a complicated test,” he says, “in a world that’s
getting more complicated.”
Arun Somasundaram, who’s seated near his family in the library
at the WASL community meeting, sees the complications he’s encountered
in Chinook’s classrooms as history.
Last year, says Somasundaram, while in the seventh grade, he was
placed in a special education math class. He concedes he wound up
there based upon a math WASL he took in the fourth grade — which,
along with hiswriting WASL, found him scoring below state standards
— and a math placement test he took upon entering Chinook. But
he credits the teacher of that special education class with helping
him grasp mathematical concepts to such a degree, he was placed in
an honors algebra class this year. The teachers of a two-week afterschool
math program last year, he adds, assisted him in passing the math
WASL. (He surpassed state standards on all of last year’s WASL
exams.) “It’s not the teachers who are doing anything
wrong,” he proclaims of the school’s testing woes. “They’re
great.”
Then what causes the low scores?
Ustanick blames lack of resources. “It isn’t about the
school, and it isn’t about the teachers,” she says. “It’s
about kids having what they need, to learn what they need to learn.”
Somasundaram says he believes that both racial perceptions and socio-economic
factors may affect student achievement. After all, as an Indian, he
says he knows that people expect him to be smart and succeed. But
as for the reasons a student might miss a state standard on the WASL,
he says, “It’s complicated.”
He thinks some students’ inability to meet standards can be
overcome, much as his were. “In elementary school,” Somasundaram
says, “I never paid attention. But when I got here, I wanted
to put my priorities in order. But some students think it’s
too late. They may have given up by now.”
Still, he insists all students can make a turn around, if they want.
With a dream of working in robot technology in the future, he says
he thinks success on the WASL can happen for every child at Chinook.
“I think everyone can pass,” says Somasundaram. “Everyone.”
| Chinook students have experienced
trouble in all areas of WASL testing. Here are percentages,
by grade, of students meeting state standards:
Reading
7th grade: Chinook: 40% State average: 62%
8th grade: Chinook: 55% State average: 70%
Writing
7th grade: Chinook: 46% State average: 65%
Science
8th grade: Chinook: 16% State average: 43%
Math
7th grade: Chinook: 24% State average: 49%
8th grade: Chinook: 26% State average: 49%
Source: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction,
2005-06 testing.
Socioeconomics play a role, too. Here’s how low-income
students at Chinook are doing:
7th grade
Reading: 32% Writing: 37% Math: 17%
8th grade
Reading: 48% Science: 8% Math: 21%
Source: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction,
2005-06 testing. |
|