In D.C. and in
Control
Washington’s reps prep for 2008
By CYDNEY GILLIS
Staff Reporter
A new Congress. A new, and long, list of priorities.
With the Democrats back in power, the House of Representatives started
plowing through a calendar of bills this week that Speaker of the House
Nancy Pelosi aims to pass in the session’s first 100 hours.
But Seattle Rep. Jim McDermott says the push — to cut deficit
spending, enact 9/11 recommendations, raise the minimum wage, and more
— isn’t so much about the first 100 hours as the 2008 election
and forcing the president’s hand on the Democrats’ agenda.
“You have to look at the next two years as a setup for the 2008
presidential election,” McDermott says. “We are going to
put forward proposals and let the American people see what the Democrats
are thinking.”
If President Bush uses his veto power, he says, the Republicans will
“have to answer for that in the next election,” he says.
Last year, McDermott, who is in line to chair the Human Resources subcommittee
of Ways and Means, introduced a universal healthcare bill called the
American Health Security Act. It would eliminate Medicare, Medicaid,
and other programs in favor of an all-in-one, single-payer system run
by the states.
While his bill may not come up in the short term, the congressman says
the debate on universal health care will start immediately — minus
the resistance that then-First Lady Hillary Clinton faced in 1993.
Since then, “Things have changed,” McDermott says. “Now
business is talking to us about [lifting] the responsibility to provide
health care.”
A “First 100 Hours” bill that will be introduced Jan. 12
aims to fix the Medicare Part D drug plan for the elderly, in part,
by allowing the government to negotiate with pharmaceutical companies
for the lowest drug prices — something the Republicans prohibited
in the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003.
“That bill was an absolute giveaway to pharmaceutical and insurance
companies,” McDermott says. “That is not in the interest
of the American people.”
Nor, the Democrats say, is relying on foreign oil, something the party
plans to address Jan. 18 in a bill that would cut royalties for oil
companies and use the money to fund renewable energy projects —
legislation that Rep. Jay Inslee, D-Bainbridge Island, helped draft.
Last year, Inslee introduced a much broader bill, the New Apollo Energy
Act, that would provide $10.5 billion for research and $49 billion for
loans to build wind, solar, and other types of clean power plants. It
would also provide tax credits for buying cars that use alternative
fuels.
With Rep. Norm Dicks, D-Bremerton, set to take over the Interior and
Environmental Subcommittee of House Appropriations, his spokesperson,
George Behan, says the congressman is already working to get more money
to clean up Puget Sound and maintain the state’s long neglected
national parks.
With the president calling to send more troops to Iraq, funding these
efforts may not be easy — one reason Democrats are advocating
new “pay-as-you-go” spending rules that Pelosi has said
could involve repealing Republican tax cuts for the very wealthy.
The war itself is a thornier issue for the party. Sen. Edward Kennedy,
D-Mass., is sponsoring a bill that would cut the purse strings for the
troop surge. But The New York Times reports that many Democrats fear
the measure could be seen as a negative for the troops currently on
the ground.
“The first thing we have to do,” McDermott says, “is
make our minds up to think about how we get out of Iraq.”
|