|
On a cherry-blossom spring day, bagpipes in full mourn,
the members of University of Washington Student Labor
Action Project (their tagline: “Students and Workers
United to SLAP Corporate Greed”) held a wake for
the recent closure of the BJ&B factory in the Dominican
Republic — the only unionized factory in the region.
The event began with an eulogy: “We are gathered
here today in mourning for the death of BJ&B, a garment
factory… long a symbol within the anti-sweatshop
movement, a concrete testament to the power of student
and worker solidarity.”
Dressed in black, carrying a tombstone, the wake processed
through campus and into President Mark Emmert's office
on Red Square, where members appealed for the school to
stand up for sweatshop-free labor.
"We're fighting for human rights standards. Poverty
leads to conflict," said Masha Burina, UW SLAP member.
"It's easy to look away."
Rod Palmquist, who delivered the eulogy dressed as a preacher,
visited non-union factories in Guatemala last summer and
heard testimonials about the working conditions. "You
have to fight for a bathroom break. A pregnant female
worker was feeling woozy but wasn't allowed to get water
or use the bathroom. She fainted, and on the way to the
hospital, lost her child."
BJ&B's contracts dwindled after its 2003 unionization:
Reebok/Adidas pulled out in 2004, Nike's orders slowed,
and the workforce was dropped from 1,600 to around 350
at February's closure.
According to the Workers' Rights Consortium, Nike cited
slower production rates, higher cost, and decreasing demand
for a particular hat produced by BJ&B as reason for
its withdrawl in late February. The situation was not
transparent, says the WRC — Nike refused to produce
information corroborating its claims.
The WRC analysis links these complaints to the unionization:
without forced overtime, production was slowed. The factory
owner, South Korea’s Yupoong Inc., had incentive
to shift contracts to its more profitable Vietnamese and
Bangladeshi factories. Universities have a powerful bargaining
tool they could use on behalf of workers: the exclusive
rights to license a factory to manufacture their logo-bearing
merchandise. Last year, UW sold just under $4 million
worth of apparel.
SLAP is proposing that all UW-licensed garment workers
be entitled to a living wage through the Designated Suppliers
Program. The DSP represents an attempt to consolidate
the influence of the $4 billion-a-year university apparel
market and reward unionized factories with longer-term,
stable contracts. This prevents the factory from being
subject to the cut-and-run tactics that closed BJ&B.
Participating schools, which include Duke and the University
of California systems, agree to absorb the cost of paying
a living wage, an expected raise in retail prices of 1
to 6 percent, according to SLAP.
The decision to join the DSP rests with the UW Licensing
Advisory Committee. Norm Arkans, of the LAC, says the
deliberations will take all quarter. “We need to
assess what the impact would be on manufacturers and workers,
and try to understand why some of our peer universities
have decided to go down this path and why others have
decided not to.”
UW SLAP will be conducting demonstrations throughout the
spring to support the DSP proposal. n
[Take action]
SLAP’s online petition is at
http://students.washington.edu/uwslap/.
|