|
There is a familiar stereotype in movies and literature
of the “rent-a-cop”: the wannabe police officer
incapable of doing anything but eating to pass the time,
who sits in front of a television as the real heroes chase
bad guys through a downtown highrise. David Miles wants
people to inspect that proverbial donut before they chomp
down.
“If you watch movies, you see how we’re portrayed,
but if you talk to people in my building, you’ll
get a different outlook on what we do,” says Miles.
He’s been a security officer in the Columbia Center
downtown for four years. When he started, he learned quickly
that what is perceived about his profession is more often
than not a cultural fallacy. Instead, he sees a certain
nobility in it.
“We are first responders,” he proclaims. “Maybe
we don’t carry a weapon, maybe we don’t have
police powers, but if anything happens, we’re first
on the scene.”
John Schroeder, a security officer for 13 years, is of
the same mind. “We’re trying to get a little
respect,” he says.
So are the 700 other security officers in the Seattle/Bellevue
area. Salaries for the position average out at $11 an
hour, usually with optional, and expensive, medical benefits.
Some security positions even start at minimum wage, with
no potential for benefits. For the last three years, officers
have been organizing via the Service Employees International
Union (SEIU) Local 6, and on March 25 they agreed on a
general contract proposal that includes a base salary
as well as legitimately affordable health care. Now they’re
ready to take the debate to their employers.
The employers represented in this round of talks include
three national companies — Allied Barton, Securitas,
and ABM Security — and one local company, Northwest
Protective Services. Charles Taylor, an organizer for
Local 6, says that the ultimate goal is a template contract
for all security companies, both national and local. None
of the companies responded to requests for comment on
the upcoming negotiations.
The Seattle City Council recently issued a proclamation
naming April 4 “Security Officer Appreciation Day.”
Although it may seem to be a gesture of solidarity with
the union, City Councilmember Jean Gooden says it’s
not about the negotiations.
“[Security officers] do play a critical role supporting
the industry’s economy,” Gooden says. “We
want people to be aware of them.”
“I’m sure the timing of [the proclamation]
doesn’t hurt,” she adds. But she insists that
the proclamation wasn’t carte blanche for the union
from the Council. “We haven’t seen any specifics
on benefits or compensation…. I hope [the officers]
can negotiate well with their employers.”
Another group that supported the Appreciation Day was
the Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA), a
business association that counts most major building owners
in the city, as well as security companies, as members.
But BOMA hesitated when it came to endorsing the union.
“I wouldn’t say BOMA supports the unionization
of security guards, but we don’t oppose it,”
says Rod Kauffman, president of BOMA. “We have encouraged
[security companies] to dialogue with the union, and we’ve
had a friendly cooperative business relationship with
Local 6.”
Kauffman says they’ve been happy to at least cooperate
with the union, because they received assurances that
there would be no strikes.
For their part, Local 6 is excited to head to the
table, and security officers like Miles and Schroeder
are itching for the chance to prove they’re worth
more than the stereotype. “As security officers,
we’re doing our best in order to do our job, and
we’re looking for the companies to recognize that
and show us the respect that we deserve,” says
Miles.
|