| Hostel
was “a place of refuge and rest”
Dear Real Change,
I am writing to express my outrage that the City of Seattle
would have to audacity to destroy the character of the
neighborhood at 84 Union St. This is bordering on criminal
behavior.
The historic building at this address was built around
1918, and variously was known as “Longshoreman’s
Hall” as well as the Ellis Island of the Pacific.
Over 900,000 immigrants were processed here, yearly —
mostly Asians. It was purchased for almost nothing by
the Port of Seattle in 1975 to be renovated as a hostel.
The property in question For decades since, it has served
as another gateway to the city. It is a place where people
of all ages and backgrounds (from throughout the world’s
neighborhoods) meet to talk and explore the world’s
issues, and their potential solutions.
Now, developers, money-mongers, and politicians have decide
that with the new four-star properties being put up next
door, such a low-life place is not chic, n’est pas?
Who gave them that authority? (We didn’t.)
Despite my 12 years of college, I am a homeless person
residing on the northern coast of Oregon who travels here
regularly. I have many contacts worldwide, and I enjoyed
the hostel as a place of refuge and rest for these several
years. I cannot afford to stay in a four-star hotel several
times per month, or even several times a year; nor would
I want to.
Nor can the throngs of students, budget travelers, and
other “real folks” who undoubtedly bring major
bucks to Seattle as they transition into that euphoric
but deadly state of affluence represented by those of
you who have revoked the lease on Hostelling International’s
premises at 84 Union.
Sadly, this is just typical of the myopic attitudes in
this backwater of civilization. Our Asian and European
friends will probably go to Moscow or Beijing next time.
Is is obvious to foreigners that city official cannot
make human and practical judgments, if only from that
obscenity of a toilet on which you guys spent some $600,000.
Why not reform yourselves, in an era of openness, restructuring,
and democracy? We the people would certainly appreciate
it. Or alternatively, we can rid ourselves of the politicians,
for as voters we are the deciders.
Lois J. DuPey
Cannon Beach, OR |