|
Last week’s announcement by the United Way of King
County that it would raise $25 million over the next two
years to move 1,000 of the “chronically homeless”
into housing met with split reactions.
Those who have never been homeless are thrilled, saying
the money will act as a catalyst for much-needed fundraising
in the private sector. Those who are homeless or live
just a step away in a shelter or single room roll their
eyes, saying it’s a nice idea that will only backfire.
Whatever the reaction, the money isn’t likely to
buy the bricks and mortar of actual new housing units,
as some media outlets suggested last week.
Vince Matulionis, director of United Way’s homeless
initiative, says the charity doesn’t envision being
a major funder of new building projects. Instead, the
agency is looking at how it can use the money, which it
will raise over the next two years, to fill the gaps left
by public agencies.
United Way can do that in two ways, Matulionis says: Beef
up existing efforts at nonprofit housing developers, so
they can field more projects each year, and provide scarce
operating funds to pay for the type of case management
services that are needed to house those who may have a
disability, addiction or trouble getting decent work.
“I expect some of our money will go to services
and operating costs,” Matulionis says. “I
expect some of our money will go into agency capacity
building.”
Building capacity among low-income housing developers,
he says, would include giving them funds to hire more
personnel, raise the salaries of existing key staff, or
buy new computers or software systems to increase their
efficiency.
The campaign will be led by United Way’s incoming
fundraising chair—former Western Wireless chief
and billionaire John Stanton—as part of the agency’s
regular annual campaign, which is hoping to raise more
than $105 million this year alone.
The $25 million for the chronically homeless will be over
and above that, Matulionis says, with the funds going
to support services at housing units that other agencies
will build or convert. The goal, he says, is to support
200 units a year over five years.
United Way will make its own funding decisions, but coordinate
with King County’s Committee to End Homelessness,
which has developed a 10-Year Plan that calls for adding
roughly 900 units of housing each year—a goal on
which the CEH is already behind.
To actually build 1,000 transitional housing units, CEH
coordinator Bill Block says, would cost about $225 million.
But he and Matulionis say the $25 million campaign is
a critical first step in getting more corporations and
private donors to step up for the chronically homeless—those
who have lived outside for a year or more or had cycles
of homelessness, sometimes involving repeat emergency
room visits or jail stays.
“The chronically homeless population is the most
visible homeless segment in the community,” Matulionis
says. “By addressing that population and showing
results, it can be a larger catalyst [to fund] the full
10-Year Plan.”
Wes Browning, a formerly homeless member of CEH’s
Single Adults Committee and columnist for Real Change,
says that, however well intentioned, the campaign will
only increase long-term homelessness, not reduce it.
The 10-Year Plan, he says, calls for cutting the 2,700
shelter beds available in King County today to 250 as
more transitional housing is built or converted. But with
shelters full and January’s annual one-night count
finding nearly 2,200 people sleeping outside, people who
become homeless in the future, he says, are largely guaranteed
to end up “chronically homeless” because they’ll
have no place to sleep at all, much less stabilize and
find new housing.
Building housing won’t solve the problem, Browning
says, because private developers are tearing down low-income
housing faster than it’s being built—something
the Committee to End Homelessness doesn’t count.
Matulionis insists, however, that prioritizing for those
most in need is the right approach.
“I’m not particularly supportive of trying
to do everything,” he says. “We’ve tried
to do that and the result at the end of the day is nothing.”
“We are very cautious about not going down the
wrong road and not creating a bigger problem than when
we started,” he says of the new campaign. In the
future, if “the One-Night count shows the family
count is increasing dramatically, we’d have to
pay close attention to that.” |