|
As they fund the military and corporate giants like
Halliburton in Iraq, U.S. taxpayers are also spending
tens of millions of dollars for the services of Blackwater
USA, a secretive army of private mercenaries that operates
with virtually no government oversight and beyond civilian
and military legal constraints.
In his New York Times bestseller, Blackwater:
The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary
Army (Nation Books/Avalon), investigative reporter
Jeremy Scahill unmasks this powerful, corporate armed
force, founded by Erik Prince, a multimillionaire conservative
with close ties to the religious right and the Republican
Party. The book chronicles the reach of Blackwater from
fighting—and dying—in Iraq, to policing
the storm-ravaged streets of New Orleans in the immediate
aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
Scahill writes for The Nation and is a correspondent
for Democracy Now! In testimony before the
House Appropriations Subcommittee in May, Scahill urged
Congress to investigate the private war contractors
like Blackwater. He warned: “The privatization
of war has both encouraged and enabled the growth and
creation of companies who have benefited and stand to
gain even more from an escalation of the war.”
Scahill recently discussed the Blackwater mercenaries
and other Bush Administration efforts to privatize government
functions with Real Change.
How would you describe Blackwater USA to a
person who hasn’t heard of the company?
We are in the midst of the most radical privatization
agenda in our history. It seeps its way into schools,
prisons, and law enforcement, and now we see this radical
privatization of war unfolding on the battlefields of
Iraq.
Most Americans believe there are 145,000 U.S. troops [in
Iraq], but almost never discussed are the 130,000 private
personnel deployed alongside the U.S. armed forces. Some
like KBR [Kellogg, Brown & Root] – a former
Halliburton subsidiary – provide “logistical
support services” to the military. They do the laundry,
drive trucks, serve food to the troops.
But there are also tens of thousands of armed individuals
who work for companies like Blackwater USA. It’s
not the biggest, it’s not the most profitable, but
it has the closest proximity to the throne in the United
States. It’s a company with deep political connections
to the Republican Party and the radical religious right.
Whenever a State Department official moves from point
A to B in Iraq, Blackwater is guarding [them]. Since 2004,
they’ve been awarded three-quarters of a billion
dollars in U.S. State Department contracts alone. Impressive
for a company that didn’t exist a decade ago.
The military once guarded ambassadors and
other U.S. officials. Why would the Administration choose
to outsource this military function?
At the end of his term as Defense Secretary under George
H.W. Bush, Dick Cheney commissioned a study from a division
of Halliburton [on] outsourcing to the private sector
the nonessential functions within the military bureaucracy
[to] free up the active duty military to do the actual
fighting.
Now, in Iraq, we see part of the combat function outsourced.
The occupation would not be sustainable without this shadow
army. The most disturbing thing is that no one is effectively
paying attention to the actions of Blackwater or other
private forces in the war zone, so you take the American
people away from a system of accountability and oversight.
And Blackwater argues that it’s above
the law and immune from lawsuits.
In the case of Blackwater, here is the basic story. In
March 2004, four Blackwater operatives were ambushed and
killed in the [Iraqi] city of Fallujah. Their bodies where
dragged through the streets and hung on a bridge. This
is when the war turned: the Bush Administration ordered
a siege on the city of Fallujah, and basically destroyed
it, and this inflamed the Iraqi resistance and led to
attacks on US forces.
A few months after the ambush, in January 2005, the families
of the four men killed in Fallujah sued Blackwater in
a groundbreaking wrongful death lawsuit, charging that
the company had sent their loved ones in jeeps instead
of armored vehicles, short two men on the mission, and
without heavy weaponry.
Blackwater responded by arguing [it] can’t be sued
for wrongful death because, “We’re a part
of the U.S. total force and therefore we should be entitled
to the same immunity from civilian litigation enjoyed
by the U.S. military.” At the same time, Blackwater’s
PR specialists from the Alexander Strategy Group [a Republican
lobbying firm] waxed poetic about how it would be inappropriate
to place Blackwater under the Uniform Code of Military
Justice, the court martial system.
Then, in Iraq, Paul Bremer’s thank you gift to Blackwater
and other contractors when he left in June 2004 [as head
of the Coalition Provisional Authority] was to [grant]
sweeping immunity to all contractors from prosecution
under Iraqi law. No military law has been effectively
applied to these forces, no U.S. civilian law, and certainly
no Iraqi law.
You write that Blackwater’s activities
adversely affect military morale.
There’s a real morale crisis on the ground in Iraq.
If you’re a rank-and-file soldier, you see these
[Blackwater] guys stroll [like] rock stars with better
body armor in many cases, better vehicles, better weapons,
and no fear of being prosecuted for any crimes, and they’re
getting paid much more than you. Blackwater pays its men
between $450 and $650 a day. Some of these guys make more
than the Secretary of Defense or the commanding generals.
The other problem for the U.S. military is a blowback
factor. When contractors shoot up Iraqis with no provocation,
[they’re] viewed as the Americans, and so [there’s]
a blowback effect: troops are attacked in revenge for
something the contractors did.
Brig. Gen. Karl Horst, the deputy commander of the 3rd
Infantry Division around Baghdad, got so outraged he tracked
contractor violence. In just 60 days, he documented 12
instances of contractors firing at Iraqi civilians, resulting
in six deaths and three injuries. That’s just one
general paying attention for two months, so you replicate
that and you have a disturbing situation that could have
disastrous consequences for active duty U.S. troops.
And you note that many Blackwater employees
are not American citizens.
Blackwater has hired scores of Chilean, Colombian, Fijian,
Polish, Bulgarian mercenaries—the list goes on and
on. This keeps a draft off the table, and you no longer
have to depend on your citizenry to staff your military.
Ultimately, it means that the military has endless offensive
possibilities limited only by the amount of money an administration
allocates for the purchase of armies.
Do we know how much taxpayers have paid for
the services of Blackwater?
Just with the State Department, Blackwater has a contract
for $750 million in so-called diplomatic security services.
That doesn’t count the work for the U.S. military,
for covert intelligence agencies, for other private companies
or for domestic work. It made tens of millions of dollars
on its Hurricane Katrina deployment, and does a steady
business in training state, local and federal law enforcement.
This company’s activities are totally shrouded in
secrecy. Leading members in Congress are unable to get
detailed information about it despite the fact that they
are on the U.S. government payroll.
You were the first to report on Blackwater’s
work in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Can you
discuss their domestic operations?
Blackwater showed up within hours of the hurricane hitting
the U.S. Gulf [Coast]. A big amount of its work was for
the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Protective
Service. I encountered Blackwater operatives on the streets
of New Orleans with M-4 rifles and pistols strapped to
their legs. The guys on the ground told me that they were
there to confront criminals and stop looters [and were]
authorized to use lethal force if necessary. One guy was
complaining that there wasn’t enough action on the
streets of New Orleans—a chilling statement.
The Blackwater guys told me they were making $350 a day
plus per diem. I got Blackwater’s contract with
the federal government: they billed taxpayers $950 per
man, per day, and raked in $240,000 per day for its Katrina
operations.
Now Blackwater is starting a new domestic operations division.
They’ve just recently opened a new training facility
[in] Illinois they call Blackwater North, [but] there’s
growing resistance to Blackwater in that community. And
in Potrero, Calif., just outside of San Diego, Blackwater
is fighting fierce, local resistance to a new camp they
want to call Blackwater West. About half of the residents
have signed a petition against Blackwater. People are
waking up to [Blackwater’s] activities, and they
don’t want guns fired in their community, a lot
of heavy traffic, helipads, and gun enthusiasts.
You’ve been disappointed by the lack
of oversight of Blackwater in Congress. Is that changing?
Now several influential Congressional committees are taking
up this issue. Leading the charge is Rep. Henry Waxman
(D-Calif.) who, within a month of the new Congress taking
power, began holding hearings on contractors.
This issue will be impossible for the Congress to ignore
because of the extent this war has been privatized, the
way the active duty military is treated versus the private
sector, the tremendous cost to U.S. taxpayers and the
unaccountability of the forces acting in the name of this
country. This will outrage people from across the political
system. If you ignore contractors like Blackwater, you
ignore half the occupation force, so this has to be a
central part of the debate on Iraq policy.
What can average citizens do to assure oversight
of war contractors?
The best thing people can do is encourage their representatives
to join members of Congress whose eyes are opening to
this system. The heads of the top 20 war contractors
in Iraq should be called in front of Congress to account
for the money they’ve spent and the actions they’ve
engaged in—in the names of the people of this
country. Let’s bring this out in the open and
see if the American people believe this system is in
the spirit of democracy, open government and international
diplomacy.
Robin Lindley is a Seattle attorney
and writer. In 2006, he chaired the World Peace through
Law Section of the Washington State Bar Association.
|