|
It looked pretty simple at first. An apartment complex
in Burien named Lora Lake was to be demolished by its
owner, the Port of Seattle, because some of the units
were in the way of the new third SeaTac International
Airport runway, and other units would be too noisy to
be livable once the runway was built. That seemed to
make sense.
Then some people started asking questions, and the answers
were disturbing. We learned that the 162 units which the
Port claimed would be uninhabitable wouldn’t be
any noisier than nearby single-family housing. We learned
that the Port wanted part of the Lora Lake property for
a warehouse. We learned that the City of Burien wanted
to plant a big-box store on part of the property. We learned
that the King County Housing Authority, which had leased
the property, offered to buy the property from the Port
for $15 million in order to save that valuable housing
stock, and the Port had said, “No, thanks.”
More voices joined in. King County
Executive Ron Sims and the City of Seattle (which controlled
a small amount of the property) argued that housing
units should be a priority. Bill Block of the Committee
to End Homelessness pointed out that in demolishing
162 apartments, we would be losing more net units than
King County had gained two years into the 10-Year Plan
to End Homelessness. The Church Council of Greater Seattle
held a Service of Lamentation, causing a Port manager
to claim that the Church Council was calling down “the
wrath of God” on the Port (a claim not immediately
denied). Burien proclaimed itself as the community with
the most affordable housing units in King County, in
apparent justification for approving the destruction
of 162 of those units. Port Chair John Creighton e-flamed
fellow-Commissioner Bob Edwards after Edwards asked
for more study before demolition, Creighton threatening
Edwards with dire consequences in his bid for re-election
and stating that he “would not tolerate any bullshit”
in an August vote on demolition. At that meeting, after
lengthy public testimony which included that of some
Tent City residents who said that they’d be happy
to be living in Lora Lake units instead of in tents,
the commissioners voted 3 to 2 for demolition.
Enter the cavalry— in the person
of King County Superior Court Judge Deborah Fleck. The
day after the Port meeting, Fleck granted an injunction
in the court case condemning the property, stopping
demolition until trial in March 2008. In addition, a
separate court case has been filed by a newly-formed
nonprofit, the Association for the Defense of Affordable
Housing, charging that the Port ignored the requirements
of the environmental impact statement it was required
to file regarding Lora Lake. Whatever happens in either
court case, the wrecking ball won’t swing before
2008.
Should we be appalled by the behavior of the Port
and the City of Burien, or hopeful because of the public
reaction to that behavior? Appalled, definitely—
but I vote for being hopeful also. In previous years,
the demolition of Lora Lake might have happened quietly,
in a vacuum, with no media attention and no packed hearing
rooms. That’s how we’ve already lost so
many units. But already, encouraged by the Lora Lake
case, a group of Ballard renters have declared their
intention to fight the conversion of their building
to condos. The fact that those two situations may not
be factually comparable isn’t important. What
is important is the growing sense of solidarity among
people who are losing their housing, and the growing
recognition on the part of the general public that every
single unit is important, every single person who needs
a roof is important, and every single moment of time
is important when you’re behind in the game. Lora
Lake helped turn on the spotlight. Our job is to keep
our eyes open, and make our voices heard about what
we see.
Sally Kinney is co-chair of the
Interfaith Task Force on Homelessness. |