January 20, 2010
Vol: 17 No: 4

News

The $700 million question

by: George Howland, Jr. , Contributing Writer

Will state officials get serious about closing tax loopholes?

Printer-Friendly Version


Like it? Share it!

 

Last week, Gov. Chris Gregoire announced her keenly awaited proposal to close tax loopholes in order to help shrink the state’s $2.6 billion deficit. Education, health and human-services advocates hoped for a big number, but they were disappointed. In fact, Gregoire’s plan fell about $2.584 billion short. 

After months of careful evaluation, the overnor only wants to cut $15.7 million in tax incentives, though she did offer $89.4 million in other new revenues. On Mon., Jan. 11, after Gregoire introduced her budget to the Senate’s Ways and Means Committee, a perplexed state Sen. Debbie Regala (D-Tacoma) asked why the governor hadn’t suggested closing more loopholes to deal with the state’s disastrous revenue situation. Gregoire replied, “It sounds simple but I found it difficult to do.” 

Marilyn Watkins, Policy Director of the Economic Opportunity Institute, says she’s found that the state’s lawmakers have created 567 loopholes worth around $53 billion in state tax breaks since 1935, when the state’s basic tax structure was created. Watkins says at least $26.5 billion of these tax breaks could not be collected in any case because of constitutional issues — like the property-tax exemption for churches.  In addition, Watkins argues that of the remaining $26.5 billion in tax loopholes, there are some — like the sales tax exemptions for food and prescription drugs — that actually improve the fairness of our state’s tax system. 

In response to the state’s budget crisis, Watkins released, on Jan. 14, an action plan that contained suggestions for $700 million of new revenue that could be found by closing loopholes — or as Watkins calls them, “tax preferences.” Watkins asserts that repealing these tax preferences would not hurt the economic recovery.

Watkins favors closing the Business and Occupation (B&O) tax deduction for investment earnings of non-financial firms — in layman’s terms, businesses other than banks — one that she claims would be worth $296 million this year. She also sees other tax loopholes — the sales tax exemptions on stockbrokers ($45 million), custom software ($70 million) and detective and security services ($62 million) — as fair game. “This is not the time to make any more cuts,” to social service or other programs, says Watkins. “We need to seriously raise new revenue.”

But state Sen. Rodney Tom (D-Bellevue), one of the vice-chairs of the Ways and Means Committee, says the minute he mentions a tax preference that should be repealed,  “I’ll have high priced lobbyists knocking on all the [legislative] members’ doors,” he says.

Tom and other legislative leaders promise that this year will be different, however. State House Speaker Frank Chopp says, “The first line of approach [to the budget deficit] is to look at tax loopholes — enough to make a big dent in the budget.” Chopp says that the House leadership has identified up to six loopholes to consider closing this year, but he would not specify which ones are under scrutiny. 

The Economic Opportunity Institute’s Watkins believes that tax preferences will not be repealed unless there is “a lot of agitation” from the general public. Watkins says, “It will take a lot of citizen effort to shore up the legislators and the governor.”

 

----

Comments

I don’t think closing tax loopholes will solve the problem.  I’m afraid the State will have to levy some new taxes.

I hope the sales tax exemption on food and prescription drugs will remain in place, and also that the sales tax rate will not be raised.  We already have one of the highest sales tax rates in the US.

My Medicaid assistance has been denied due to a clerical error.  I would like to have limited dental coverage again.

Brenda Ray | submitted on 01/23/2010, 4:13pm

There are so many needed programs, while tax loopholes continue for the Holy Trinity of Washington: Boeing, Microsoft and Weyerhauser.
If ANY company who got tax breaks to keep them from taking jobs out of the state takes any job out to the state, then they should lose that tax break.
In addition our legislators have developed the habit of taking money out of dedicated funds, like say, The Lotto money that was supposed to all go to education, and put it in the General fund. This needs to stop.
And finally, a law needs to be passed to have those who earn over $100,000 a year pay a 2% income tax to the state. And this money should go only for programs benefiting human beings in need.

Linde Knighton | submitted on 01/25/2010, 7:22pm


Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Search Our Archives

Real Change Blog

Our economy, explained in song
Thursday, December 15 at 6:20pm

How would you balance the state budget?
Monday, November 28 at 5:49pm

Did you hear that?
Wednesday, November 23 at 10:29am

Come be a Part of Surviving the Streets!
Thursday, October 27 at 12:28pm

Summertime
Thursday, October 6 at 1:05pm

The Courage of Our Convictions
Tuesday, October 4 at 1:48pm

Reflection on the Blessing of the Totem Pole
Wednesday, September 21 at 5:12pm

Real Change on Facebook

Real Change on Twitter


Follow realchangeorg on Twitter


Nominate a Vendor of the Week